Fulkerson Reaction

Fulkerson gets on a realistic level when writing about research projects. One thing that specifically caught my attention was when he explained that a research paper should make an argument instead of having one. Also, the superficial sources section of this piece made me ashamed for not putting more effort into my previous works. Fulkerson gives not only tips on how to do a successful research paper but warns us to steer clear of common pitfalls. The fact that he even stated that he took two months to compose this piece of writing proves even the best writers really need to focus and give attention and dedication to their writing.

Reaction to the Nelson Reading

I found myself offended by Nelson's writing. I felt as if he knew a dirty little secret, I am Beth. I find myself doing the same things that she did: procrastinating, repeating information, etc. In my case, I giving a lot of facts is what I was taught needed to be in a research paper. I also think it is the safe way to do a research paper. The person writing it does not really have to worry about their developmental process in regards to their reaction and/or interpretation of the information he or she found. If one merely sticks to writing facts and giving a one paragraph conclusion of everything and (maybe) inserting at the end, one's own opinion, its easier and there can be no argument. However, the paper is boring at that point! I think practice in the process of actually writing the paper AFTER doing research and formulating a strong thought is the best and most effective, not to mention beneficial strategy for writing a research paper.